10 worst movies of my lifetime

I have caught this movie on telly by chance. I realized it was the Crow series when I saw Edward Furlong in full make-up. Well he was either playing the Crow or very bad version of Joker from Batman. I could not keep track of what was going on, but I was mesmerized by the way Furlong slouched. Yes, slouched. To this day I do not know in aid of what that was, but no wonder I could not keep up with the plot.

Before I hear from any of you Segal enthusiasts yes I am aware he does ALL the stunts himself. It has been pointed out to me before. However that does not excuse his bad acting. He should be a stuntman then, not qualify himself as an actor.

What in the world possessed John Travolta to make this movie, I don't know. No scratch that. What in the world's name possessed all these other actors to star in this one that is the question. Although I am a bit surprised Tom Cruise did not at least get a cameo role. Sci-Fi at its worst.

The silliest movie ever. And not in a good way. Virtual reality my arse. Just plain bad, bad, bad. And for the record I usually love Stephen King.

From what I have gathered, this movie has a cult following. Why? Because Gina Gershon and Elizabeth Berkley take their clothes off? You can see that in any strip club. And as for acting I thought Elizabeth Berkley had a severe case of PMS, but then I realized it was supposed to be dramatic acting. Tssss!

Has anyone seen this movie ever? If Jennifer Lopez/Ben Affleck, the most popular combo of that time, did not manage to attract a few people to the cinema, can you imagine how bad it really is?

I am aware Al Pacino is in this movie and up until this point I thought Al Pacino could not possibly be in a bad movie. Boy was I wrong. I was distracted by 2 things, a) Al Pacino's dirty fingernails throughout the movie (absolutely horrid) and b) I kept waiting for something substantial to happen. When something did happen and I exclaimed "Finally!" the closing credits started to roll. Maybe I am completely obtuse or it is Heidegger-deep, however to this day I do not know what this particular movie was about.

I love comedies. Love them. But this is not a comedy. This is hour and half of pure torture and hour and a half I of my life I will never get back. The only good thing is I got this on DVD, if I went to a cinema I would demand a refund. As I am not confrontational person by nature, you can get a glimpse of how bad it is.

How can it even be possible that a man who made “Snatch” and “Lock, Stock and 2 smoking barrels” agreed to put his name on this movie? Madonna can be Guy Ritchie's missus 3 times over, but there are no excuses for anything like this mind-numbingly boring drivel. And as experience has shown Madonna should stick to singing.

Now I know this will subject me to scorn, however I saw this movie in the cinema. I have actually paid for a ticket to see this rubbish! In my defense, even though there is no reasonable defense, I thought Dennis Rodman was absolutely charming at that time. What is the movie about? Suffice to say it had Jean Claude Van Damme, Dennis Rodman,Mickey Rourke combo. Now that had written flop all over it even before the movie was released.